Secretary Watson argues for stricter campaign finance laws, points to Jackson

Last week, coastal media outlets announced a local judgment against state control of state-owned tidelands, going as far to claim the State is trying to control casino leases , question future tidelands fund contributions, and doubt the use of taxpayer dollars on these lawsuits. Once again, and similarly to my predecessors, I find myself in the crosshairs of local authorities acting in their own best interest while performing my responsibility as trustee of the Public Trust Tidelands. While I cannot and will not contest every biased media outlet, it is imperative to reaffirm the costly effects of not assuming the fiduciary duty owed to all statewide beneficiaries. In 1989, the Mississippi Legislature codified its public policy in favor of preserving tidelands and submerged lands in their natural state while allowing the Secretary of State the authority to rent or lease said land. Further, the fund was established to ensure all revenue generated was shared across the three coastal counties to further preserve and protect the Public Trust Tidelands while enhancing public access to the Tidelands. When I took office in 2020, the legal authorities giving the Secretary of State’s Office management and control over the tidelands on behalf of the State were numerous and uncontroversial. They ranged from legislative statutes to judicial cases requiring the Secretary of State to act in the best interests of the public to facilitate greater access and enjoyment of the tidelands. Since then, locally elected judges have led the way in eroding these authorities to allow for increasing private use of the public sand beach, while taking away this office’s ability to manage tidelands for the State’s benefit. Recent events have demonstrated the clash over control of the public tidelands property, the public sand beach, and the collection of related rents. Instead of principled uniform management, this erosion has fractured management into several different bodies, each with its own agenda, creating conflicts within the trust. For instance, the City of Biloxi has assumed the role of issuing private-use leases over the public sand beach in favor of certain new casino developments while providing good-ole-boy lease rates. When compared to the average casino rent paid to the State for the same use, Biloxi’s “preferred” leases have no basis in fair market value and do not go to the public trust tideland fund as required by the legislature. Biloxi is the only beneficiary under this scheme to the detriment of other Coastal cities and the state as a whole. To be clear, the State’s position is not to control development or attempt a land grab. As a matter of fact, proposed legislation my office drafted gave cities even more control. The principles applied have and will always be consistent with the purpose of the Tidelands Act. I whole-heartedly support development, casinos or otherwise, because of the benefits to the Tidelands Fund. Last fiscal year alone, the Tidelands Fund garnered $11,426,985 under my management, and if functioning as originally intended, this amount should only increase. However, should the court system continue to diminish the Secretary of State’s role in safeguarding the public trust tidelands while the legislature remains questionably quiet, Mississippians are well on their way to seeing a dramatic decline in the tidelands fund income used to support public access and management projects across the entirety of the coast. Look no further than the aforementioned article questioning whether the latest summary judgment provides an out for a coastal onshore casino in Biloxi having to pay the statutory in-lieu rents into the tidelands fund. While I do not believe it does, a locally elected judge may disagree, which would result in north of a $600,000 hit to the fund. But where, you ask, would the money go? Ask the City of Biloxi. All of Mississippi should be concerned, and as long as I’m Secretary of State, I will act to uphold my duties as Public Trust Tidelands trustee, but more importantly, follow the law. MICHAEL WATSON Secretary of State State of Mississippi

While this year’s legislative session is full steam ahead and our office continues to promote the implementation of new security measures for Mississippi elections, it’s important to pause and provide an update on the status of safeguards employed from previous sessions. Through House Bill 1310 (passed during the 2023 Legislative Session), our office and county election commissioners were provided with definitions for functions and processes we may utilize to conduct voter roll maintenance (VRM) beginning January 1, 2024. Having completed a full year of application, I’m excited to report on these efforts. Working with the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, we launched a pilot program in Lafayette County using information from Experian®, which utilizes information from the USPS and commercially available data, to identify voters who have moved from their place of registration. Prior to H.B. 1310, our office solely relied on post office and/or other government data for conducting VRM. Under the new law, counties may use any reliable information available to determine if a voter has moved within or outside of the state. Accessing commercial data, like Experian’s, is the first of its kind in Mississippi. With the success of the pilot program, we are excited to announce we have just signed a contract to institute this new resource in all 82 counties. In an effort to further expand resources without added cost, our team reached out to neighboring states to sign memorandums of understanding (MOU) for data exchanges. Tennessee, Arkansas, Louisiana, Alabama, Florida, and, most recently, Kentucky have all signed MOUs while the data exchange with Alabama has already taken place. In reviewing the data from Alabama, over 8,000 names were found to be registered in both Alabama and Mississippi. While this act itself is not illegal, it would be illegal for one person to cast a ballot in both states. In short, there was the potential for 8,000 illegal votes to be cast. We were able to communicate this information to local county officials to take action. Because many of Mississippi’s local races require plurality, just one vote may change an election. Finally, I want to thank each of you for supporting our office’s efforts to continue securing Mississippi elections. Through your emails, calls, text messages, etc., we are able to voice your concerns when communicating with our state legislature. As a reminder, I encourage you to continue holding elected officials accountable even after the passage of meaningful legislation. Should you have further questions about our efforts, please reach our office at secretary@sos.ms.gov . MICHAEL WATSON Secretary of State State of Mississippi

(The Clarion-Ledger) –Even if the state wanted to bring charges against federally indicted-Jackson Mayor Chokwe Antar Lumumba for failing to submit several campaign finance reports, it likely wouldn’t due to Mississippi’s confusing campaign finance laws. The Attorney General's Office, headed by Lynn Fitch, recently told the Clarion Ledger the state’s campaign finance enforcement laws are confusing, difficult to understand and ultimately difficult to enforce because there are several state agencies involved before the AG can see a case. If that even happens, the punitive measures are minor at best, AG Chief of Staff Michelle Williams said. "The current system for assessing penalties for failing to timely file reports is broken,” Williams said. “It requires work by three agencies — possibly four for a municipal election — and the Attorney General’s Office is in every instance the last step, requiring notification by another agency to trigger our part. In addition, the misdemeanor prosecution and $500 in civil penalties are too light to deter bad behavior. And the many grace periods allowed for curing a delinquent report can push action against a tardy candidate until after the election. General Fitch is hopeful that this year the Legislature will take up the campaign finance reform package she has put forward for the past two years to close the gaping holes in the system, streamline enforcement of its provisions, and improve transparency." While Mississippi's campaign finance laws spell out punishments and penalties for office-holders or candidates who don't file annual campaign finance reports, the laws do not state what official or agency is in charge of holding politicians accountable for failure to file. It begs the question: how are campaign finance laws supposed to be enforced in Mississippi if no one is monitoring to ensure the laws are followed? It's like having laws, but no police force. For Lumumba, the mayor hadn't filed a report since 2021 until the end of January when he submitted reports for 2022, 2023 and 2024 ahead of qualifying for his reelection bid for 2025. For those who hold public office, campaign finance reports are required to be filed annually. The fact that Lumumba hadn't filed a report in three years is a clear violation of state law, but yet he was not investigated, penalized or prosecuted for those missed reports. Moreover, Lumumba's missed reports were seemingly not an issue or even known to the wider public until he was federally indicted on bribery charges in November. Lumumba is accused of accepting $50,000 in bribes disguised as "campaign contributions" from undercover FBI agents. Since then, Lumumba has refused to answer any questions about his campaign finances or why he missed submitting the annual reports, saying only that it is related to his indictment "and so I will not speak to it." According to Mississippi law, two potential routes for prosecution for those who have committed campaign finance violations are through a state district attorney’s office or through the Mississippi Ethics Commission, which then notifies the Mississippi Attorney General's Office. Both are long, winding processes that could potentially take months — an issue the Attorney General's Office has said needs to be corrected. In Lumumba’s case, the District Attorney that could potentially prosecute him for campaign finance violations is Hinds County District Attorney Jody Owens — the same man who was indicted along with Lumumba and is accused of helping to facilitate bribes to the mayor and two other members of the Jackson City Council. This would be a clear conflict-of-interest for Owens. His office has also not indicated it is moving in that direction. Jackson, Mississippi Secretary of State spar over who's in-charge of enforcement In a recent statement to the Clarion Ledger, Mississippi Secretary of State Michael Watson said his office has “limited authority to impose civil penalties (fines) for failing to file reports,” because the secretary of state's offices' oversight “only extends to state district and statewide candidates and PACs supporting those candidates.” “We cannot impose a fine on a county or municipal candidate,” Watson said. “Actions which can be taken regarding municipal candidates, such as withholding payment or charging with a misdemeanor, can only be made at the city level or by the county prosecutor, respectively. Our office does not have enforcement authority for municipal candidates, but those that do failed to act.” Watson is correct that one penalty for office-holders is to withhold their salary, but the law does not spell out who would be in charge of doing that. It’s unclear if that is a power of the Jackson City Council, which controls the city’s finances, or if that would be another city department. In any case, all city department directors report to Lumumba. After receiving Watson's statement, the Clarion Ledger asked Jackson's Municipal Clerk Angela Harris why Lumumba's missed campaign finance reports for the past three years were never reported to the secretary of state. Harris' municipal clerk office is where all campaign finance reports are submitted in Jackson. Jackson's City Attorney Drew Martin responded in an email that there was no law that requires Harris to report candidates who do not submit their campaign finances, but only that a municipal clerk "forwards copies of all reports it receives to the Secretary of State." Elizabeth Johnson, the communications director for the secretary of state, confirmed that Harris had previously sent in other candidates' campaign finance reports that were submitted. "There is no statute or rule which directs or authorizes the municipal clerk to maintain a list of candidates who do not file campaign finance forms, nor is there any statute or rule which directs or authorizes the municipal clerk to report candidates who do not file reports — not to the Secretary of State nor to anyone else," Martin said. Will Mississippi's lawmakers finally address the gaps in campaign finance laws? For the past two years, both Watson and Fitch have urged lawmakers to pass campaign finance reforms and to add “teeth” to campaign election violation enforcement. In 2024, bills filed to address those concerns died by legislative deadlines. It should be noted that every lawmaker within the Mississippi Legislature — since they are elected officials — is required by law to file annual campaign finance reports. So essentially, campaign finance reform bills are asking lawmakers to police themselves. That being said, this year several reform bills were filed and are being worked through the legislative process. Whether they make it through and become law is still yet to be seen as lawmakers are still working their way through the 2025 session. Both the House and Senate have moved forward legislation to address campaign finances and elections in general. Original Story

As the chief elections officer for the state of Mississippi, Michael Watson is focused on delivering clean elections for Mississippi voters—and confidence in the election process. Turning that idea into action means funding for cybersecurity at the local level, post-election audits (an idea supported by Hillary Clinton and John Podesta prior to 2016), and even a full re-write of election codes to close the loopholes that allowed for ballot harvesting.

Learn more about FGA reforms to safeguard our elections here.

Original Story

When Secretary of State Michael Watson started studying regulations in Mississippi, he found something shocking: 118,000 regulations on the books, making it one of the most regulated states in the southeast. Here, Secretary of State Watson shares how his office is fighting back, including a frustrating tale about a federal agency standing in the way of a grocery store coming to a small town in Mississippi.

Watch to see what he deems “drops of prosperity,” and read more about how FGA is fighting for limited government here.

Original Story

Click here or the screenshot above to view the full video.

( SuperTalk) - With just over two weeks until Election Day, Mississippians are gearing up to cast their ballots for several statewide elections and a contentious presidential election. Mississippi Secretary of State Michael Watson wants voters to know the election process is safe in the Magnolia State.  

Although government, court, and other third-party research shows that voter fraud is extremely rare, a nationwide NPR  poll says 6 in 10 Americans are concerned about interference that could influence the upcoming election. Watson vouches that his office, along with the state legislature, has added every possible safeguard to protect election integrity.

“I hate when people say, ‘You’re just trying to make it hard on people to vote.’ No, we aren’t,” Watson said during an appearance on MidDays with Gerard Gibert . “We’re trying to follow the law and make sure there’s integrity in the process. That’s what we’re doing.”

Among those safeguards include a dual-verification process, the first step of which is called DPS Verify , for voter registration and partnerships with five other southeastern states to compare and verify voter rolls. Additionally, the legislature banned ballot harvesting in the state, which is the gathering and submitting of absentee or mail-in ballots by third-party individuals.

“One of the things that I’ve tried to tell Mississippians is, ‘You can rest assured that we have a great process here,'” Watson continued. “There won’t be questions. And thank the Lord, a lot of people kind of laugh at this, that we aren’t one of those that will be in the crosshairs on election night.”

Watson, who will also aid other secretaries of state on election night as the incoming president of the National Association of Secretaries of State, encouraged voters to hold their local election officials accountable. One way to do that, according to Watson, is to check voter roll numbers on the secretary of state office’s website  – data which is updated monthly.

“I’m really comfortable with where we are,” Watson said. “I think we’ve done a great job and appreciate the legislature’s help.”

Other state officials, such as leaders from the U.S. Attorney’s Office, are also making citizens aware that they will emphasize both voter safety and election legitimacy on and after November 5.  

“Every citizen must be able to vote without interference or discrimination and to have that vote counted in a fair and free election,” U.S. Attorney Todd Gee said. “Similarly, election officials and staff must be able to serve without being subject to unlawful threats of violence. The Department of Justice will always work tirelessly to protect the integrity of the election process.”

Gee noted in a press release that Mississippians should be vigilant in reporting potential fraud or voting rights concerns, which can be done by contacting Assistant U.S. Attorneys Bert Carraway and Samuel Goff at 601-973-2826 or 601-973-2855 on Election Day. The FBI will also have special agents available in local field offices throughout the country to receive allegations of fraud and other election abuses.  

In addition, the FBI will have special agents available in every field office throughout the country to receive allegations of election fraud and other election abuses on Election Day. The Mississippi FBI field office, located in Jackson, can be reached by the public at 601-948-5000.

Magnolia Tribune – With less than three weeks until the presidential election, the Mississippi Secretary of State’s office along with local elected election commissioners and circuit clerks are working to reassure voters who may be concerned with election security and the validity of their vote in the Magnolia State. Lawmakers passed the Mississippi Voting Modernization Act in the 2022 legislative session, providing grant funding for counties to replace touchscreen voting machines with approved machines that scan paper ballots. The goal, as stated at the time, was to ensure the security of the voting process utilizing paper ballots, therefore leaving a paper trail. Previous touchscreen machines did not always provide a paper record of the vote. Now, after they present valid identification and sign the voter roll, Mississippi voters are handed a paper ballot that is to be marked with a pen before placing it in a scanning machine. The scanned ballot is then shown on the screen for verification by the voter before the paper ballot is placed inside a secure portion of the machine for auditing purposes. Secretary of State Michael Watson told Magnolia Tribune that under the modernization act, counties were provided a list of three approved vendors to purchase voting equipment. Before grant funding was approved, each county had to submit documentation for review to ensure the equipment met the necessary requirements. The deadline to purchase and put the new machines into use was January 1, 2024, meaning voters who cast a ballot in a Primary Election this year would have already seen the new machines in use. Several regulations were put in place concerning the type of machines counties could purchase in an effort to prevent hacking. For instance, machines that have “wireless remote connections” are prohibited. In addition, the use of pre-scored punch cards is not allowed. “A machine could not have a modem or some other device installed that allowed access to the Internet,” Watson clarified. Secretary Watson said approved machines have built-in security measures that prevent tampering, such as attempts to sideload malicious software via a USB thumb drive. “It would be incredibly difficult for a person to tamper with any voting machines. There are multiple layers of security, testing, and protections that cannot be discussed for security reasons,” Watson said. Local election controls On the local level, each county elects their own set of election commissioners to oversee each election. Some of their duties include training poll workers and conducting regular accuracy tests on the voting machines prior to Election Day. The Secretary of State’s Office provides election commissioners with annual certification training to ensure they are complying with the various requirements under Mississippi election laws. “In addition to this annual training, the Mississippi Secretary of State’s Office provides summer workshop trainings and weekly conference calls in the lead up to the election,” Watson explained. Secretary Watson said he has full confidence in those on the local level to ensure elections are conducted securely. “Our circuit clerks and election commissioners are the unsung heroes when it comes to elections in Mississippi, and the post-elections audits provides a vehicle for praising their successes,” Watson added. Auditing election results Another layer of security came with the passage of HB 1310 during the 2023 legislative session. The law provides the Secretary of State’s office with the ability to audit election results and procedures. Secretary Watson said the law gives his office another means to ensure elections are being held according to state law by holding election officials on the local level to an increased level of accountability as implemented by the Secretary of State. “Any missteps will turn into opportunities for an additional level of training and dialogue on the results,” Watson said. In the digital age, there is a need to ensure other aspects of the voting process are also secure. As such, Watson’s office has invested in cybersecurity systems and training. By working with the Legislature, Election Support Funds were made available to counties for cybersecurity improvements. “Our office is always looking at what other states are doing and brainstorming amongst ourselves to further ensure the integrity and security of our elections,” Watson said. “That said, we have been extremely aggressive over the last four and a half years making as many improvements as possible. I couldn’t be more proud of our team and am thankful the Legislature has passed most of our election integrity legislation.” Changes on the horizon? During the 2024 legislative session, discussions on allowing in-person early voting and first-time online voter registration were hot topics. Those debates have continued in recent hearings. Early voting was proposed by State Senator Jeremy England (R). Under his bill, early voting would have been allowed for 15 days prior to an Election Day, excluding Sundays and ending the Saturday before the scheduled election. The measure would have eliminated in-person absentee voting, but mail-in absentee voting would still have been accessible. Currently in Mississippi, voters can vote 6 weeks prior to Election Day. This election year, that meant as early as September 23. READ MORE: Lawmakers hold joint hearing on early voting, online voter registration As a security measure, Senator England’s bill would have required the voter to show a valid ID to participate in early voting, the same requirement currently used for absentee voting and voting at the polls on Election Day. Secretary Watson said his office supports closing the current window absentee voting provides. “We are advocating for the tightening of the absentee window to 30 days and the reduction of absentee options if early voting is implemented,” Watson told Magnolia Tribune. “We are always looking at opportunities to make the process better and even more secure.” First-time online voter registration would allow a person who is currently not registered to do so online, negating the need to do so in person at their local circuit clerk’s office. During a recent hearing on the proposed changes, lawmakers were told that if implemented, first-time online registration could provide cost savings in reduced paper expense and lead to a reduction in data entry errors. Due to the proliferation of the internet and smartphones, offering first-time online voter registration was also touted as a vehicle to entice more young adults to register. To Secretary Watson, any impact the implementation of early voting and/or first-time online voter registration would have on the security of the election process in Mississippi would be down to the policies implemented by the Legislature and signed off on by the Governor. “While we have seen proposals for how it would work in Mississippi, until a process has been put into law, we cannot speculate as to what kind of effect it could have on election security in Mississippi,” Watson added. He reminds Mississippi’s voters that while first-time online registration is not currently available, those who have registered in-person at their local circuit clerk’s office can update their information by way of his office’s website.

Click the image above to view entire video